Please register the email address except for the Gmail address as your contact.
You may be unable to receive the confirmation email with the Gmail address.
In case you registered the Gmail address and have not received the confirmation email, please confirm your abstract submission from the “Confirmation/Modification” button.
Wednesday, 5th, July –
Thursday, 31st, August 2023
Noon on Thursday, 14th September 2023
Noon on Thursday, 28th September 2023
Noon on Friday, 6th October 2023
Abstract Submission is now closed.
Thank you for your submission.
Please select the most appropriate category for your presentation.
▶Presentation style
Oral presentation
In recent years, diagnostic methods using magnification or NBI, and minimally invasive treatment using EMR/ESD; have become well established in gastric cancer. However, we sometime experience trouble cases with difficult diagnosis or serious complications. In this session, we would like to discuss what is pitfall in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment, and how to avoid and deal with them.
In the treatment of Stage IV gastric cancer, different treatments are intermingling and may be selected depending on the site of metastatic organ or the patients' condition , however, there is no clear evidence or guide line. In this session, we would like to discuss the treatment strategies for Stage IV gastric cancer, including surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.
The prediction of prognosis using clinicopathological factors is important for gasric cancer patients in determining the strategy of treatment, including surgery and drug therapy. However, it has various advantages and disadvantages in accuracy or invasiveness. In this session, we would like to discuss the usefulness and future prospects of novel prognostic predictors.
Surgical treatment for GIST such as LECS is widespread and has been popularized. On the other hand, the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor has been reported for GIST with metastases and recurrence, nevertheless, the prognosis of advanced gasric GIST is still poor. In this session, we would like to discuss the current status and future prospects of diagnosis and treatment for GIST.
Robotic surgery has been acceptable and being well established around the world, however, how to secure surgical field or to find the target layer and dissect the tissue are still challenge. In this session, we would like to discuss the differences of them between laparoscopic and robotic surgery, and explore the original techniques and the ingenuity to prevent complications in robotic surgery with viewing the operation video.
1 | Epidemiology |
---|---|
2 | Molecular biology |
3 | Pathology |
4 | Genomics |
5 | Translational research |
6 | Biomarker |
7 | Tumor microenvironment |
8 | AI |
9 | Endoscopic therapy |
10 | Endoscopic diagnosis |
11 | Imaging diagnosis |
12 | H.pylori |
13 | Progression of gastric cancer |
14 | Rare metastasis / Micrometastasis |
15 | Intraoperative frozen section |
16 | Cancer stem cell |
17 | Clinical pathology |
18 | Prognostic factor |
19 | Precision medicine |
20 | Clinical study |
21 | Chemotherapy |
22 | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
23 | Adjuvant chemotherapy |
24 | Second-line chemotherapy |
25 | Third-line chemotherapy |
26 | Intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
27 | Molecular targeted therapy |
28 | Immunotherapy |
29 | Radiation therapy |
30 | Conversion surgery |
31 | Surgery |
32 | Laparoscopic surgery |
33 | Robot surgery |
34 | Function-preserving surgery |
35 | Cytoreductive surgery |
36 | LECS |
37 | Surgical navigation |
38 | Postoperative functional assessment |
39 | Postgastrectomy syndrome |
40 | Perioperative management |
41 | Postoperative complications |
42 | ERAS |
---|---|
43 | Navigation Surgery |
44 | Peritoneal dissemination |
45 | CART |
46 | Stent placement |
47 | Liver metastasis |
48 | Recurrence |
49 | Early gastric cancer |
50 | Advanced gastric cancer |
51 | Scirrhous gastric cancer |
52 | Gastric stump carcinoma |
53 | Multiple gastric cancers |
54 | Gastric tube cancer |
55 | Esophago-gastric junction cancer |
56 | Gastric cancer in elderly patients |
57 | AFP-producing gastric cancer |
58 | EBV-related gastric cancer |
59 | Gastrointestinal stromal tumor |
60 | Malignant lymphoma |
61 | Gastric neuroendocrine tumor |
62 | Guidelines |
63 | Clinical pathway |
64 | Postoperative surveillance |
65 | Long-term survival case after chemotherapy |
66 | NST |
67 | Outcome |
68 | QOL assessment |
69 | Cachexia |
70 | Nutrition |
71 | Obesity |
72 | Case report |
73 | Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma |
74 | Multidisciplinary treatment |
75 | Palliative therapy |
76 | Team approach |
77 | Patient Advocacy |
78 | MDT conference |
79 | Medical cooperation |
80 | Oral care |
81 | EFTR |
82 | Others |
Please note that the decision on abstract acceptance/rejection is left to the sole discretion of the Congress President.
English
English
English
Title: up to 100 characters (including spaces)
Abstract: up to 1600 characters (including spaces)
The author is required to report applicable COI (Conflict of Interest) by completing the "Conflict of Interest Disclosure" part in the Abstract Submission process.
Secretariat of the 96th Annual Meeting of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association
c/o Congrès Inc.
3-6-13 Awajimachi, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-0047, Japan
E-mail:endai-96jgca2024@congre.co.jp
© 2023 The 96th Annual Meeting of
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association